set, viewed as preferred participants in the think- ing process required to produce our Sustainable Development Plan. Our very first step was to con- fer with them and poll their opinions. Their im- pressions and expectations incited us to modify several aspects of the path we were following, thus demonstrating the relevance of our ap- proach. One prominent example was the gaps in our sustainable development reports: we were admonished for outlining only our successes and for not including any consistent indicators or specific objectives. the production-related weaknesses that were brought to our attention, although only to a lim- ited degree. Our Sustainable Development Plan, which is very close to completion, will provide evi- dence of the thorough re-assessment we have carried out on our practices. of alarm, is the very basis of the principle of con- tinuous improvement which, we believe, enables Cascades to exemplify just how accountable it is as a company. structive feedback you will provide us, and I in- vite you to join us on our course to an ever-in- creasing accountability. of our stakeholders to follow this path. while carrying out this enormous undertaking. One thing we have discovered is that entrenching our usual practices into a system entails a re- view of what has defined us since the Company's inception and gives rise to certain questions about our day-to-day actions. Do any other the most stringent SD standards? Do our em- ployees feel as appreciated as we believe them to be? Are the communities in which Cascades has set up operations satisfied with our contribu- tion? These were some of the questions we needed to answer... and the responses had to be checked and validated by third parties. emaire |